4.3 Article

Lessons from the genomic analysis of Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera) holotypes in the MIZA collection (Maracay, Venezuela)

期刊

ZOOTAXA
卷 5319, 期 4, 页码 573-581

出版社

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5319.4.7

关键词

classification; genomics; phylogeny; biodiversity; Venezuela

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genomic sequencing and analysis of holotypes from the MIZA collection in Maracay, Venezuela, and comparison with other species and their type specimens contribute to our understanding of the taxonomy of these species. The study confirms Jemadia demarmelsi Orellana, [2010] as a separate species, and genetically verifies its female individual. Several taxonomic statuses are clarified, including the reclassification of Amenis pedro O. Mielke & Casagrande, 2022 and Jemasonia sosia (Mabille, 1878) as species-level taxa rather than subspecies. Additionally, new subspecies and combinations are proposed for Amenis ponina rogeri Orellana, [2010], Jemasonia pater ortizi (Orellana, [2010]), Jemadia pseudognetus imitator (Mabille, 1891), and Damas cervelina Orellana & Costa, 2019.
Genomic sequencing and analysis of holotypes from the MIZA collection (Maracay, Venezuela) and their comparison with other species and their type specimens advances our understanding of their taxonomy. Jemadia demarmelsi Orellana, [2010] is confirmed as a species-level taxon and its female is genetically verified. The following are species-level taxa, not subspecies: Amenis pedro O. Mielke & Casagrande, 2022, stat. nov. (notAmenis pionia (Hewitson, 1857)) and Jemasonia sosia (Mabille, 1878), stat. rest. (not Jemasonia hewitsonii (Mabille, 1878)). Amenis ponina rogeri Orellana, [2010], stat. nov. and Jemasonia pater ortizi (Orellana, [2010]), stat. nov. are subspecies, not species. Jemadia pseudognetus imitator (Mabille, 1891), comb. nov. (not Jemadia hospita (Butler, 1877)) and Damas cervelina Orellana & Costa, 2019, comb. nov. (not Megaleas Godman, 1901) are new combinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据