4.4 Article

New species of the Spiny Mouse genus Neacomys (Cricetidae, Sigmodontinae) from northwestern Ecuador

期刊

ZOOKEYS
卷 -, 期 1175, 页码 187-221

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.1175.106113

关键词

Choco biogeographic; Neacomys tenuipes; premontane forest

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new species of the Neacomys genus, Neacomys marci, previously misidentified as Neacomys tenuipes, has been discovered in the Choco biogeographic region in northwestern Ecuador. This finding increases the diversity of the Neacomys genus to 24 species, making it one of the most diverse genera within the sigmodontine rodents.
Neacomys is a genus of small spiny or bristly sigmodontine rodents that are common components of mammalian faunas in multiple biomes on Central and South America. Recent studies on this group have demonstrated that there is cryptic diversity yet to be discovered within currently recognized species that have not received comprehensive revisions, as well as in areas that have been overlooked. Here we ratify this assertion by describing a new species previously misidentified as the Narrow-footed Spiny Mouse (Neacomys tenuipes) from the Choco biogeographic region in northwest-ern Ecuador, Neacomys marci Brito & Tinoco, sp. nov. Distinctiveness of this entity is supported by the combination of the following morphological characters: small size (head-body length 65-85 mm); long tail (69-126% longer than head-body length); pale buff-colored but gray-based belly fur; white throat; hypothenar pad usually absent; long nasals; and a condylar process higher than the coronoid process. Likewise genetic distance analyses and phylogenetic reconstructions based on cytochrome-b (Cytb) sequence data indicate a clear divergence from typical populations of N. tenui-pes, and a sister relationship between them. The results presented here increase the diversity of Neacomys to 24 species, placing it among the most diverse genera within the sigmodontine rodents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据