4.0 Article

Recycling of Disposable Surgical Instruments - Is It Worth It?

期刊

ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE
卷 148, 期 4, 页码 329-336

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-2122-7519

关键词

Recycling; sustainability; carbon footprint; hospital waste; CO2 emissions; incineration

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The German healthcare sector is a major contributor to the country's greenhouse gas emissions due to the large amount of waste generated by hospitals. However, this study shows that it is possible to recycle contaminated disposable surgical instruments, which can lead to a reduction in CO2 emissions and the loss of valuable resources. Nevertheless, the higher costs of recycling and the need for in-house decontamination pose challenges to implementing such projects.
Introduction The German healthcare sector is responsible for 5.2% of the country's greenhouse gas emissions. One contributing factor is the enormous amount of waste generated daily in German hospitals, making them the fifth largest waste producer in Germany. Despite the potential for recycling, a significant portion of hospital waste is incinerated, as mandated by current regulations. This results in high levels of noxious CO (2) emissions and the loss of valuable resources. The goal of this project was to demonstrate the feasibility of recycling complex, contaminated disposable surgical instruments.Methods The study included frequently used disposable surgical instruments that could potentially be recycled as electronic waste. The instruments were wipe-disinfected and sterilised internally within the hospital. After sterilisation, the devices could be classified as electronic waste in consultation with the environmental authorities and then machine-recycled externally by a waste disposal company. Sorting machines shredded and separated the instruments into individual fractions of cables, plastics, different metals, and circuit boards, which were further processed into secondary raw materials.Results In the first six months (09/2022-03/2023), 239 kg of material were recycled instead of being incinerated. This resulted in a reduction of 545 kg CO2 e. The metal content was estimated as 50% of the total weight; 30% were recyclable plastics, resulting in an 80% recycling rate. The ongoing recycling costs were 1.90 euro/kg after deducting revenues. Thus, recycling in this model was approximately 3.9 times as expensive as incineration. A survey of the operating theatre personnel found high satisfaction with the recycling project and a minimal additional workload of less than five minutes.Conclusion We demonstrated that recycling of contaminated disposable surgical instruments is possible in coordination with government authorities. This approach avoids waste incineration and leads to a reduction in CO2 -equivalent emissions. However, the higher costs of recycling and the requirement for in-house decontamination pose limitations on the implementation of such projects. To address this, it is necessary for lawmakers to reconsider current regulations and involve manufacturers in recycling costs to fully exploit the enormous recycling potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据