4.6 Article

Azathioprine monotherapy withdrawal in inflammatory bowel diseases: A retrospective mono-centric study

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 29, 期 27, 页码 4334-4343

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i27.4334

关键词

Azathioprine; Inflammatory bowel diseases; Ulcerative Colitis; Crohn's Disease; Relapse; Side effects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is no consensus on the recommended duration of and optimal time to stop azathioprine (AZA) therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study analyzed data from IBD patients who discontinued AZA therapy and found that the timing of cessation and stopping point can affect the risk of disease relapse.
BACKGROUNDThere is no consensus on the recommended duration of and optimal time to stop azathioprine (AZA) therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Determining the optimal duration and cessation time can help to balance the risks of long-term intake with the possibility of relapse after cessation.AIMTo describe the events following AZA cessation.METHODSRetrospective analysis was performed to examine data from adult patients affected by IBD who were followed at the University of Padua and had started but then discontinued AZA between 1995 and 2022. Data on therapy duration, reasons for cessation, and type of relapse after cessation were collected. Cox regression models were used to estimate the risk of relapse in different subgroups.RESULTSA total of 133 ulcerative colitis patients and 141 Crohn's disease patients were included. Therapy with AZA was stopped in the 1(st) year in approximately 34% of patients but was continued for more than 10 years in approximately 10% of cases. AZA discontinuation was due to primary failure or disease relapse in 30% of patients and due to disease remission in 25.2% of patients. Most of the remaining cases stopped AZA therapy due to side effects (primarily clinical intolerance, cytopenia, and pancreatic disease). Patients who stopped AZA for clinical remission had an 83% lower risk of relapse during the observation time than other groups, with a relapse-free rate of 89% after 1 year and 79% after 2 years.CONCLUSIONAZA administration is effective and safe, but it requires careful monitoring for potential minor and major side effects. Only 10% of patients who achieved remission with AZA needed a new treatment within 1 year of drug interruption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据