4.7 Article

A new theoretical model for surface roughness prediction in rotational abrasive finishing process

期刊

WEAR
卷 524, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2023.204772

关键词

Material removal; Surface roughness; Rotational abrasive finishing; Nanofinishing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rotational abrasive finishing (RAF) is a new nano-finishing technique that utilizes stirring-blades and the workpiece to apply finishing forces. A theoretical model was proposed to gain deeper insights into the material removal mechanism, surface roughness prediction, and forces in the RAF process. The experimental results were in good agreement with the theoretical results, with a maximum error of about 24%. The initial theoretical assumptions were identified as the main reason for the difference between the two.
Rotational abrasive finishing (RAF) is a new nano-finishing technique in which the finishing forces are applied to the workpiece by the opposite rotations of a stirring-blades and the workpiece. The RAF process allows for finishing the inner and outer surfaces of workpieces, particularly complex ones with axial symmetry. The present study aims to propose a new theoretical model to obtain deeper insights into the material removal mechanism, surface roughness prediction, and forces in RAF process. Since the abrasive-workpiece interaction is random and complex in nature in the RAF, some initial assumptions were considered. To validate the repeatability of the experimental results, the experiments were designed based on the Response surface method (RSM). To validate the new proposed theoretical model, a number of influential parameters were investigated. It was found that the stirring-blade speed (S), working gap (W), and abrasive grain size (A) had significant effects on Ra. The minimum surface roughness (Ra) was obtained to be 46.87 nm at a rotational speed of 600 rpm, a working gap of 1 mm, and grain size of 18 mu m. The experimental results were relatively in good agreement with the theoretical results so that the maximum error was about 24%. This can be assumed that the most important explanation for the difference between the theoretical and experimental results can be attributed to the initial theoretical assumptions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据