4.6 Article

Magnetic field and slip effects on free convection inside a vertical enclosure filled with alumina/water nanofluid

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 355-364

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.08.013

关键词

Nanofluid; Thermophoresis; Vertical enclosure; Nanoparticles migration; Magnetic field; Modified Buongiorno's model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper deals with a theoretical investigation of natural convective heat transfer in a vertical enclosure filled with alumina/water nanofluid in the presence of a uniform magnetic field. A two-phase mixture model is used for nanofluid in the hypothesis that Brownian motion and thermophoretic diffusivities are the only significant slip mechanisms between solid and liquid phases. Because of the non-adherence of the fluid-solid interface in the presence of nanoparticle migrations, slip condition is considered at the surfaces, which appropriately represents the non-equilibrium region near the interface. Assuming a fully developed flow and heat transfer, the basic partial differential equations including continuity, momentum, and energy have been reduced to two-point ordinary boundary value differential equations and solved numerically. It is found that the nanoparticles moves from the hot wall (nanoparticles depletion) toward the cold wall (nanoparticles accumulation), constructing a non-uniform nanopartides distribution. Then, it is shown that nanoparticle depletion at the hot wall is responsible for the controversial issue on the anomalous changes in the heat transfer rate. In addition, the slip parameter lambda has a negative effect on the heat transfer rate, which is more pronounced for larger nanoparticles. The results also indicated that in the presence of the magnetic field, the near wall velocity gradients increase, enhancing the slip velocity and reduce the heat transfer rate. (C) 2014 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据