4.5 Article

Efficacies of a locust bean gum polymer on the startup of a novel upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating municipal sewage

期刊

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 88, 期 7, 页码 1672-1687

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2023.298

关键词

anaerobic; granulation; locust bean gum; municipal sewage; startup phase; upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the potential of locust bean gum (LBG) in accelerating the startup of a novel upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor for municipal sewage treatment. The results show that the reactor with LBG as an additive achieved an accelerated startup in 40 days, with higher COD removal efficiency compared to a conventional system. This confirms the positive impact of LBG on reactor startup.
The present study investigates the potential of locust bean gum (LBG), in accelerating the startup of a novel upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor handling municipal sewage. Under identical conditions, two lab-scale UASB reactors were operated in parallel, to substantiate this idea. The novel reactor (RH) with an inner centric hybrid UASB module and an outer concentric downflow hanging sponge (DHS) unit started off with an LBG polymer as an additive. Its performance was compared with a conventional system (RC). RH outclassed with an accelerated startup in 40 days, with the highest COD removal of 89% by the UASB compartment and 95% by the entire system (UASB Rho DHS). RC took nearly 85 days to achieve the highest COD removal of 83%. The polymer also succeeded with a dense sludge bed fastening most of the anaerobes, read by the least sludge volume index (SVI) of 26 mL/g. Specific methanogenic activity (SMA) (RH - 0.715 +/- 0.05 and RC - 0.670 +/- 0.07 g CH4-COD/g VSS/ day) and extracellular polymer (ECP) concentration (0.30-0.32 g/g VSS) of biomass in both reactors were almost similar. This further confirmed that early granulation was induced solely by the polymer and it also had no deleterious impact on substrate transfer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据