4.7 Article

Prolonged Drought in a Northern California Coastal Region Suppresses Wildfire Impacts on Hydrology

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022WR034206

关键词

wildfire; hydrology; streamflow; threshold; burned area; resilience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of wildfires on hydrological changes in the Russian River Watershed in California and finds that the influence of wildfires ceases to increase beyond a certain threshold of burned area. Drought and climate conditions have a greater impact on streamflow variability compared to wildfires. This suggests that wildfire adaptation and drought factors in Mediterranean ecoregions buffer the hydrological response to fires.
Wildfires naturally occur in many landscapes, however they are undergoing rapid regime shifts. Despite the emphasis in the literature on the most severe hydrological responses to wildfire, there remains a knowledge gap on the thresholds of wildfire (i.e., burned area/drainage area ratio, BAR) required to initiate hydrological responses. We investigated hydrological changes in the Russian River Watershed (RRW) in California, a coastal, Mediterranean, drought-prone, wildfire-adapted ecosystem, following ten wildfires that burned 30% of the watershed. Our findings suggest that sub-watersheds of the RRW have not burned beyond an intrinsic, unknown, threshold required to initiate change. Using paired watersheds, we examined spatiotemporal patterns of pre-and-post wildfire hydrology with a rainfall-runoff hydrological model. Even though these successive wildfires burned 1%-50% of each sub-watershed (1%-30% at moderate/high severity), we found little evidence of wildfire-related shifts in hydrology. As a function of BAR, wildfire imposed limited effects on runoff ratios (runoff/precipitation) and runoff residuals (observations-model simulations). Our findings that post-wildfire runoff enhancements asymptote beyond 30% burn indicate that when a watershed is burned beyond a certain threshold, the magnitude of the hydrologic response no longer increases. Drought and storm conditions explained much of the variability observed in streamflow, whereas wildfire explained only moderate variability in streamflow even when wildfire accounted for >45% BAR. While the BAR in the RRW was sufficiently beyond previously reported minimum disturbance thresholds (>20% burned forest), the lack of hydrological response is attributed to buffering effects of wildfire adaptation and drought factors that are unique to Mediterranean ecoregions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据