4.8 Article

Microplastics occurrence and fate in full-scale treatment wetlands

期刊

WATER RESEARCH
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120106

关键词

Constructed wetland; Roots; Vegetation; Nature-based solutions; Sludge; Polymers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment wetlands (TWs) have been proven to be an effective technology for removing microplastics (MPs) from wastewater. This study investigates the dynamics and fate of MPs in two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) using TWs, highlighting the role of macrophyte roots in retention.
Treatment wetlands (TWs) are an efficient technology for removing microplastics (MPs) from wastewater, according to previous studies. This study investigates the dynamics and fate of MPs in two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) using TWs, one with horizontal subsurface flow (HF) and another with a floating plant system (FS). Special attention is paid to the retention produced in the sludge and the role of macrophyte roots. The abundance of MPs in the influent to the WWTPs was on average 20.3 +/- 0.85 MP/L and 8.4 +/- 1.13 MP/L in HF and FS respectively, while the effluent had 0.58 +/- 0.07 MP/L and 0.17 +/- 0.06 MP/L, thus giving overall efficiencies of 97.42% and 98.13%, respectively. In the HF wetland, sludge samples near the inlet and the outlet were taken, distinguishing between sludge adhered to gravel and sludge attached to roots. In the floating macrophytes, sludge samples from secondary and tertiary treatments were taken. The results indicate that roots play a significant role in MPs retention. In the HF wetland, the complex formed by roots and gravel attached more MPs than gravel alone in the final zone of the wetland. In the FS, roots retained a significant quantity of MPs, both in the secondary and tertiary treatments, thus giving rise to a sludge less concentrated in MPs. This study aims to improve the knowledge of MPs behavior and fate in full-scale TWs, providing valuable information to enhance retention efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据