4.6 Article

Multi-style image generation based on semantic image

期刊

VISUAL COMPUTER
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-023-03042-2

关键词

Image generation; Generative adversarial network; Style transfer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Image generation has always been an important direction in computer vision research. The proposed multi-style image generative network efficiently generates high-quality images with different artistic styles based on semantic images. It has faster result generation speed compared to the current state-of-the-art methods.
Image generation has always been one of the important research directions in the field of computer vision. It has rich applications in virtual reality, image design, and video synthesis. Our experiments proved that the proposed multi-style image generative network can efficiently generate high-quality images with different artistic styles based on the semantic images. Compared with the current state-of-the-art methods, the result generation speed of our proposed method is the fastest. In this paper, we focus on implementing arbitrary style transfer based on semantic images with high resolution (512 x 1024). We propose a new multi-channel generative adversarial network which uses fewer parameters to generate multi-style images. The network framework consists of a content feature extraction network, a style feature extraction network, and a content-stylistic feature fusion network. Our qualitative experiments show that the proposed multi-style image generation network can efficiently generate semantic-based, high-quality images with multiple artistic styles and with greater clarity and richer details. We adopt a user preference study, and the results show that the results generated by our method are more popular. Our speed study shows that our proposed method has the fastest result generation speed compared to the current state-of-the-art methods. We publicly release the source code of our project, which can be accessed at.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据