4.4 Article

Developmental validation of a novel multiple genotyping assay with 24 Canine STR loci

期刊

VETERINARY QUARTERLY
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2023.2262521

关键词

STR; canine 25A kit; individual identification; paternity test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed and validated the Canine 25 A kit, which offers a precise and dependable tool for canine individual identification and parentage determination. Through the validation process, the kit demonstrated high sensitivity, inhibitor tolerance, canine specificity, and species specificity, highlighting its significance in forensic applications.
Canine individual identification and parentage testing are essential in various fields, including forensics and breeding programs. This study aimed to develop and validate the Canine 25 A kit, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system designed to address these critical requirements. This novel system enables the simultaneous amplification of 24 canine autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) loci and one sex-determining marker. Validation of the Canine 25 A kit was conducted following the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM) guidelines, demonstrating significant sensitivity, high inhibitor tolerance, canine specificity within a mixture, species specificity, and precision in genotype determination. The Canine 25 A kit was crucial in resolving several forensic cases, such as casework samples from a dog attack incident and parentage determination. Its effectiveness in genotyping these samples highlights its significance in forensic applications. Population genetic parameter analysis revealed a high discriminatory power, as indicated by the calculated combined discrimination power (CDP) values for each breed exceeding 0.999 999 999 999, while the combined power of exclusion (CPE) surpassed 0.9999. Overall, the Canine 25 A kit offers a precise and dependable tool for canine individual identification and parentage determination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据