4.6 Article

Au/In2S3 nanocomposites for selective triethylamine detection at low temperature

期刊

VACUUM
卷 216, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.112429

关键词

Gas sensor; Au nanoparticles; Indium sulfide; Nanocomposites; Triethylamine; DFT calculation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, Au/In2S3 nanocomposites were grown directly on Al2O3 ceramic tubes by hydrothermal method, which exhibited prominent selectivity for triethylamine (TEA). The optimized operating temperature for Au/In2S3 nanocomposites was reduced to 160 degrees C, and the response was significantly improved due to the spillover effect and catalysis of Au nanoparticles. The sensing mechanism was explained through density functional theory (DFT) calculations and analysis of adsorption energy and electron behavior.
As a typical environmental pollutant, triethylamine (TEA) poses a serious threat to people's life and health, so it is very important to monitor it in real time and accurately. In this paper, Au/In2S3 nanocomposites with prominent selectivity for TEA were directly grown on Al2O3 ceramic tubes by hydrothermal method. The characterization results showed that In2S3 samples were composed of nanosheets and presented as flower spheres with a diameter of about 5 & mu;m, which were uniform in size and good in crystallization. In addition, the optimum operating temperature for pure In2S3 is 240 degrees C, while the optimum operating temperature for Au/In2S3 nanocomposites is reduced to 160 degrees C, and the response is also significantly improved, from 354.8% to 802.3%, which is due to the spillover effect and catalysis of Au nanoparticles. Finally, the adsorption energy and electron behavior were calculated and analyzed by density functional theory (DFT), and then the sensing mechanism was explained. Therefore, Au/In2S3 sensors have potential application value in the practical monitoring of TEA, and provide a feasible strategy for improving the response of metal sulfide sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据