4.6 Article

Insights into the granular flow in rotating drums

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 12-25

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2015.06.010

关键词

Discrete element method; Velocity profile; Active layer thickness; Rolling; Cascading; Circulation time

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scaling relations for the velocity profile and circulation time, which can be used in design and scale-up, are of great importance in rotating drums. We conducted simulations by discrete element method at various operating conditions (which covers both rolling and cascading regimes) for spherical and non-spherical particles. New scaling relations were proposed for evaluating and fully characterize velocity profile and circulation time in both rolling and cascading regimes. Using dynamic angle of repose, effect of shape was included in these correlations to extend them to spherical and non-spherical particles. Simulation results can satisfactorily reproduce experimental measurements. Visual results show that transition from rolling to cascading regime depends not only on Froude number, fill level and particle size, but also on the particle shape. The surface velocity is scaled with peak velocity and half chord length and its profile is asymmetric with the maximum occurring after the mid-chord position for all simulations. We obtained a correlation for the peak velocity based on our simulations as well as available experimental data in literature. We also found the velocity profiles along the bed depth in active and passive layers. Our results show that the circulation time of particles follow a log-normal distribution. The mean circulation time decreases with rotation speed and drum diameter and increases with fill ratio. This value is greater for spherical particles compared to non-spherical particles. Correlations are also proposed for mean and standard deviation of the circulation time. (C) 2015 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据