4.7 Article

Ultrasound-assisted enzyme extraction and properties of Shatian pomelo peel polysaccharide

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106507

关键词

Shatian pomelo peel polysaccharide; Ultrasound-assisted enzyme extraction; Properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Shatian pomelo peel was used as the raw material to extract polysaccharides using hot water extraction and ultrasonic-assisted enzyme methods. The optimal parameters for ultrasonic-assisted enzyme extraction were determined using response surface methodology. The results showed that ultrasonic-assisted enzyme extraction yielded higher content of polysaccharides and better antioxidant activity compared to traditional hot water extraction.
In this study, Shatian pomelo peel was used as the raw material for extracting polysaccharides using hot water extraction (HW) and ultrasonic-assisted enzyme (UVE) methods, respectively. The optimal parameters for extractingShatian pomelo peel polysaccharides (StPP) using the ultrasound-assisted enzymatic method were determined using response surface methodology (RSM). The optimal conditions for the extraction of StPP were as follows: ultrasound power 350 W, ultrasound time 50 min, enzymatic digestion time 50 min, compound enzyme addition 1.5%, and enzymatic digestion temperature 55 degrees C. The yield of StPP was found to be 30.1310% under these conditions. Comparing the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of StPP extracted using different methods, it was observed that ultrasound-assisted enzyme extraction resulted in higher yield, sugar content and glucuronic acid content of StPP compared to traditional hot water extraction. Additionally, StPP extracted by ultrasound-assisted enzyme extraction showed better antioxidant activity. These results suggest that ultrasound-assisted enzymatic extraction is an effective method to enhance the activity of natural polysaccharides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据