4.7 Article

An experimental study on the evolution of flame length and tilt angle under the joint effect of tunnel curved ceiling restriction and longitudinal ventilation

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105374

关键词

Longitudinal ventilation; Curved ceiling restriction; Flame length; Fuel mass loss rate; Flame tilt angle; Building safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper developed a model for flame length and fuel mass loss rate based on flame morphology under the constrained conditions of tunnel curved ceiling. The study found the relationship between air entrainment velocity and longitudinal ventilation speed, and the correlation between the product of flame length and air entrainment velocity and fuel mass loss rate. Furthermore, the paper expanded the applicability of flame tilt angle models and discovered that the flame tilt angle is smaller when attached to the wall at the same wind speed.
The model about flame length and fuel mass loss rate in this paper was developed based on the flame morphology with different longitudinal ventilation speeds when the flame was confined by the tunnel curved ceiling restriction. Secondly, after analyzing the experimental data, it was found that the air entrainment velocity was proportional to the 0.22nd power of longitudinal ventilation speed. Thirdly, the product of flame length and air entrainment velocity was proportional to the fuel mass loss rate, and the above models could better describe the characteristic evolution behaviors of flame length. Furthermore, the relation between fuel mass loss rate and longitudinal ventilation speed was established. Finally, this paper broadened the applicability of other scholars' flame tilt angle models, and found that the flame tilt angle is smaller when the flame is attached to the wall at the same wind speed. It is obvious that the above results supplement the classical tunnel-fire theory, which can be further applied to prevention and control of tunnel fire, and ultimately ensure building safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据