4.7 Article

Tribological characteristics of additively manufactured 316 stainless steel against 100 cr6 alloy using deep learning

期刊

TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108893

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Wear; Tribology; Deep learning; SS 316

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Under different working conditions, the tribological characteristics of materials exhibit a complicated and nonlinear relation. This study utilizes deep learning technologies to predict the tribological characteristics of different materials based on data obtained from ball-on-flat experiments, and analyzes the wear tracks. The findings reveal that the additively manufactured material wears with an average of 58% less intensity compared to the casted material, and the CNN Attention model demonstrates higher levels of accuracy and lower loss metrics.
Under different working conditions, the tribological characteristics of materials show a complicated and nonlinear relation. As a result, it is crucial to advance tribology by prioritising a data-driven strategy to estimate service capability in order to expedite the material design and preparation. With this aim, the present work firstly deals with the implementation of novel deep learning technologies in predicting tribological characteristics of additively manufactured and casted 316 stainless steel against 100 cr6 alloy. The coefficient of friction and frictional forces data from ball-on-flat experiments were used to develop the different deep learning models i.e., CNN, CNN-LSTM, and ATTENTION based CNN. Then, the wear tracks of tested samples were analysed with the SEM analysis. According to the findings of the wear rate, the AM material wears with an average of 58% less intensity than the casted material. In addition, the performance of the CNN Attention model demonstrated higher levels of accuracy and lower loss metrics in comparison to the CNN and CNN-LSTM classifiers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据