4.6 Article

The goblet cell-derived mediator RELM-β drives spontaneous colitis in Muc2-deficient mice by promoting commensal microbial dysbiosis

期刊

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 1218-1233

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/mi.2015.140

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Crohn's and Colitis Canada (CCC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intestinal goblet cells are potentially key players in controlling susceptibility to ulcerative colitis (UC). Although impaired mucin (Muc2) production by goblet cells increases microbial stimulation of the colonic mucosa, goblet cells secrete other mediators that may influence or promote UC development. Correspondingly, Muc2-deficient ((-/-)) mice develop spontaneous colitis, concurrent with the dramatic upregulation of the goblet cell mediator, resistin-like molecule-beta (RELM-beta). Testing RELM-beta's role, we generated Muc2(-/-)/Retnlb(-/-) mice, finding that RELM-beta deficiency significantly attenuated colitis development and symptoms compared with Muc2(-/-) mice. RELM-beta expression in Muc2(-/-) mice strongly induced the production/secretion of the antimicrobial lectin RegIII beta, that exerted its microbicidal effect predominantly on Gram-positive Lactobacillus species. Compared with Muc2(-/-)/Retnlb(-/-) mice, this worsened intestinal microbial dysbiosis with a selective loss of colonic Lactobacilli spp. in Muc2(-/-) mice. Orally replenishing Muc2(-/-) mice with murine Lactobacillus spp., but not with a probiotic formulation containing several human Lactobacillus spp. (VSL#3), ameliorated their spontaneous colitis in concert with increased production of short-chain fatty acids. These studies demonstrate that the goblet cell mediator RELM-b drives colitis in Muc2(-/-) mice by depleting protective commensal microbes. The ability of selective commensal microbial replacement to ameliorate colitis suggests that personalized bacterial therapy may prove beneficial for treatment of UC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据