4.5 Article

Hub genes in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis and immunohistochemistry

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101781

关键词

Gastric cancer; Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric; junction; Weighted gene co-expression network analysis; immunohistochemistry analysis; Hub gene

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilizing weighted gene co-expression network analysis and immunohistochemistry, this study identified CD93 as a hub gene associated with tumorigenesis in AEG, suggesting its potential critical role in AEG biology.
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common malignant tumor, and it is usually fatal. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) accounts for about 50% of all GC cases. However, the systematic co-expression analysis of this tumor does not fully explain its pathogenesis. This study aimed to identify hub genes based on weighted gene co-expression networks and immunohistochemistry analyses.Methods: The RNA-seq data of 22 AEG patients were processed using weighted gene co-expression network analysis. We differentiated the modules with clinical tumor markers and performed Gene Ontology and pathway enrichment analysis. We identified the hub genes related to the biological processes of tumorigenesis based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis and immunohistochemistry analysis.Results: Twenty-five distinct co-expression gene modules were identified; the tumorigenic genes CD93, TRIM28, SLC3A2, CBX4, PATL1, and ZNF473 had high intramodular connectivity. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that these hub genes are upregulated in AEG. Statistical analysis indicated that the expression of CD93 was correlated with the T stage and maximum tumor diameter.Conclusion: Weighted gene co-expression network analysis and immunohistochemistry identified CD93 as a hub gene that might be critical for AEG biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据