4.7 Review

Active substances of fat-soluble vitamins: Advances in extraction and analysis approaches

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.117276

关键词

Fat-soluble vitamins; Carotenoids; Sample pretreatment; Chromatography; Mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses and compares the latest advances in extraction and chromatographic methods for analyzing the active forms of fat-soluble vitamins (FSVs) in various matrices. It focuses on newly established extraction and analytical approaches for multi-form vitamin analysis, as well as the suitability and specificity of multi-dimensional chromatography-based methods for FSV substances. Analytical challenges related to mass spectrometry detection of FSV substances are also briefly discussed.
Fat-soluble vitamins (FSVs) occur in various active forms, each of which exhibits the biological activity of the respective vitamin and performs the same metabolic functions within the body. The accurate determination of these compounds in food, biological, and pharmaceutical samples is significant for food labeling, treatment/ diagnosis of hypo/hypervitaminosis, pharmacological research, and quality supervision of food/drug. In this review, the most recent advances in extraction and chromatographic methods to evaluate active forms of FSVs in various matrices have been discussed and compared. Owing to the recent research trends in the multiformvitamin assay, particular attention was devoted to the newly established extraction and analytical approaches allowing the simultaneous isolation, separation, and detection of multiple FSV compounds, considering the challenges and their potential solutions. The suitability and specificity of multi-dimensional chromatographybased approaches for FSV substances have been illustrated in detail. Analytical challenges related to mass spectrometry detection of FSV substances have also been briefly discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据