4.6 Review

Venous Thromboembolism and Estrogen-Containing Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy

期刊

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-2188-8898

关键词

transgender; estrogen; venous thromboembolism; hormone therapy; gender

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gender-affirming therapy (GAHT) involves the use of hormones to develop physical characteristics of the identified gender. However, exogenous estrogen therapy increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially in transgender women. Modern GAHT preparations have lower thrombogenicity, but further research is needed to understand VTE risk and its correlation with other factors in transgender women.
Gender-affirming therapy involves the use of hormones to develop the physical characteristics of the identified gender and suppressing endogenous sex hormone production. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a known risk of exogenous estrogen therapy, and while evidence of VTE risk among transgender women using modern gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is still emerging, it is thought to affect up to 5% of transgender women. Historically, GAHT was associated with a high risk of VTE; however, modern preparations are less thrombogenic mainly due to significantly lower doses used as well as different preparations. This review presents the available literature regarding the following four topics: (1) risk of VTE among transgender women receiving estradiol GAHT, (2) how the route of administration of estradiol affects the VTE risk, (3) perioperative management of GAHT, (4) VTE risk among adolescents on GAHT. There is a need for large, longitudinal studies of transgender women using GAHT to further characterize VTE risk and how this is affected by factors such as patient age, duration of GAHT use, tobacco use, body mass index, and comorbidities. Future studies in these areas could inform the development of clinical guidelines to improve the care of transgender people.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据