4.6 Article

Impedance planimetry and panometry (EndoFLIP™) can replace manometry in preoperative anti-reflux surgery assessment

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10419-w

关键词

Endoflip; Panometry; Antireflux; Manometry

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impedance planimetry and panometry are sensitive tools for assessing motility under general anesthesia or sedation, showing potential as alternatives to high-resolution manometry, particularly in patients with difficult access or tolerance issues.
BackgroundEndoluminal functional impedance planimetry and panometry assesses secondary peristalsis in response to volumetric distention under sedation. We hypothesize that impedance planimetry and panometry can replace high-resolution manometry in the preoperative assessment prior to anti-reflux surgery.MethodsSingle institution prospective data were collected from patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery between 2021 and 2023. A 16-cm functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) assessed planimetry and panometry prior to surgery under general anesthesia at the start of each case. Panometry was recorded and esophageal contractile response was classified as normal (NCR), diminished or disordered (DDCR), or absent (ACR) in real time by a single panometry rater, blinded to preoperative HRM results. FLIP results were then compared to preoperative HRM.ResultsData were collected from 120 patients, 70.8% female, with mean age of 63 +/- 3 years. There were 105 patients with intraoperative panometry, and 15 with panometry collected during preoperative endoscopy. There were 60 patients (50%) who had peristaltic dysfunction on HRM, of whom 57 had FLIP dysmotility (55 DDCR, 2 ACR) resulting in 95.0% sensitivity. There were 3 patients with normal secondary peristalsis on FLIP with abnormal HRM, all ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). No major motility disorder was missed by FLIP. A negative predictive value of 91.9% was calculated from 34/37 patients with normal FLIP panometry and normal HRM. Patients with normal HRM but abnormal FLIP had larger hernias compared to patients with concordant studies (7.5 +/- 2.8 cm vs. 5.4 +/- 3.2 cm, p = 0.043) and higher preoperative dysphagia scores (1.5 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.3, p = 0.021).ConclusionImpedance planimetry and panometry can assess motility under general anesthesia or sedation and is highly sensitive to peristaltic dysfunction. Panometry is a novel tool that has potential to streamline and improve patient care and therefore should be considered as an alternative to HRM, especially in patients in which HRM would be inaccessible or poorly tolerated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据