4.7 Article

Optimization and mechanism of precise finishing of TC4 alloy by plasma electrolytic polishing

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 467, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129696

关键词

Plasma electrolytic polishing; Orthogonal experiment; Roughness; Vapour gaseous envelope; TC4 alloy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A plasma electrolytic polishing (PEP) technique was used to obtain high-quality surfaces of a TC4 alloy with high reflectivity. An orthogonal experiment was conducted to investigate the factors influencing the surface quality, and it was found that temperature had the greatest effect on surface roughness. After PEP, the alloy's surface roughness and crest and trough area decreased significantly.
A plasma electrolytic polishing (PEP) technique was used to yield high-quality, precise surfaces of a TC4 alloy to ensure high reflectivity. An orthogonal experiment was carried out to investigate the multiple factors affecting the surface quality of the alloy during the polishing process. The factors that affect the surface roughness are ranked as follows based on the extent of the effect: temperature > time > voltage > depth. The surface crest and trough area decreases by an order of magnitude, and the average roughness of the alloy is reduced to approximately 1/27 of its original magnitude after PEP. The vapour gaseous envelope (VGE) ascends as the bubble expanded under the buoyant force of the electrolyte, causing the thickness of the plasma-gas layer close to the electrolyte-air interface to increase. Further, it is proposed that the mechanism of surface smoothing during the PEP process involves a combination of discontinuous discharge, electrochemical reactions, and dissolution, thereby finishing the surface of the TC4 alloy. This work provides an alternative to the surface finishing of TC4 by PEP, which is expected to be a promising technique for polishing complex structures, especially porous structures (such as 3D printed Ti, Cu, Al, Nb, Mg, and their alloys).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据