4.5 Article

Fabrication and performance of Nb3Sn superconducting joints

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/ace702

关键词

Nb3Sn; superconducting joint; joint resistance; persistent-mode operation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nb3Sn superconducting joints were developed through powder metallurgy and their characteristics were investigated. The crystal morphology, phase distribution, grain boundaries, and physical grain orientation of the joints were analyzed using electron backscatter diffraction. The Nb3Sn-Nb3Sn joints exhibited electrical resistances at the 10(-13) ohm level under a 5.5 T magnetic field, as measured by current decay method.
Nb3Sn superconducting joints were developed, and the joint characteristics were investigated. The joints were prepared by powder metallurgy to sinter the precursor powders that were mechanically alloyed. The optimized parameters were confirmed through x-ray diffraction studies to confirm the stoichiometry of Nb, Sn, and Cu. First, the precursor powders after mechanical alloying were heat treated without the Nb3Sn wires. Electron backscatter diffraction was used to quantify the crystal morphology, phase distribution, grain boundaries, physical grain orientation, and so on. Small equiaxed Nb3Sn grains were formed after heat treatment. The high-angle grain boundaries in Nb3Sn indicated the complete solid-state diffusion reaction. After the Nb3Sn was successfully prepared, and the superconducting characteristics were measured, we introduce the Nb3Sn wires to prepare Nb3Sn joints and measure their electrical properties. To use the space as economically as possible, the joint was tested under different background fields to estimate the joint resistance under various locations in the magnet. The experimental method and the test results are reported in this work. The joint resistance was tested by using the current decay measure method. The electrical resistance of the Nb3Sn-Nb3Sn joints was on the 10(-13) & omega; level under the 5.5 T magnetic field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据