4.7 Article

Transcriptional Targets of TWIST1 in Human Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells Mechanistically Link Stem/Progenitor and Paracrine Functions

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/stmcls/sxad070

关键词

TWIST1; bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; mesenchymal stromal cells; E-box elements; RNA-Seq; ChIP-Seq; biomarkers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite clinical testing, MSC-based therapies are not effective due to lack of predictive biomarkers. TWIST1 predicts inter-donor differences in MSC quality attributes. The present work identified TWIST1 targets related to ECM structure, skeletal and circulatory system development, interferon gamma signaling, and inflammation, which indicates the mechanistic link between stem/progenitor and paracrine activities of MSCs. The findings provide potential genes for further studies.
Despite extensive clinical testing, mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC)-based therapies continue to underperform with respect to efficacy, which reflects the paucity of biomarkers that predict potency prior to patient administration. Previously, we reported that TWIST1 predicts inter-donor differences in MSC quality attributes that confer potency. To define the full spectrum of TWIST1 activity in MSCs, the present work employed integrated omics-based profiling to identify a high-confidence set of TWIST1 targets, which mapped to cellular processes related to ECM structure/organization, skeletal and circulatory system development, interferon gamma signaling, and inflammation. These targets are implicated in contributing to both stem/progenitor and paracrine activities of MSCs indicating these processes are linked mechanistically in a TWIST1-dependent manner. Targets implicated in extracellular matrix dynamics further implicate TWIST1 in modulating cellular responses to niche remodeling. Novel TWIST1-regulated genes identified herein may be prioritized for future mechanistic and functional studies. Graphical Abstract

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据