4.5 Article

Handling misclassified stratification variables in the analysis of randomised trials with continuous outcomes

期刊

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 42, 期 19, 页码 3529-3546

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.9818

关键词

covariate misclassification; covariate-adaptive randomisation; randomisation error; stratification error; stratified randomisation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many trials use stratified randomisation to allocate participants, but it is unclear how to adjust for stratification variables affected by misclassification. A simulation study comparing different adjustment methods for continuous outcomes was conducted. Adjusting for the true strata was found to be optimal, while adjusting for the randomisation strata or the updated strata depended on the specific setting. The updated strata method is recommended for adjustment, along with subgroup analyses, in order to address stratification errors in practice.
Many trials use stratified randomisation, where participants are randomised within strata defined by one or more baseline covariates. While it is important to adjust for stratification variables in the analysis, the appropriate method of adjustment is unclear when stratification variables are affected by misclassification and hence some participants are randomised in the incorrect stratum. We conducted a simulation study to compare methods of adjusting for stratification variables affected by misclassification in the analysis of continuous outcomes when all or only some stratification errors are discovered, and when the treatment effect or treatment-by-covariate interaction effect is of interest. The data were analysed using linear regression with no adjustment, adjustment for the strata used to perform the randomisation (randomisation strata), adjustment for the strata if all errors are corrected (true strata), and adjustment for the strata after some errors are discovered and corrected (updated strata). The unadjusted model performed poorly in all settings. Adjusting for the true strata was optimal, while the relative performance of adjusting for the randomisation strata or the updated strata varied depending on the setting. As the true strata are unlikely to be known with certainty in practice, we recommend using the updated strata for adjustment and performing subgroup analyses, provided the discovery of errors is unlikely to depend on treatment group, as expected in blinded trials. Greater transparency is needed in the reporting of stratification errors and how they were addressed in the analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据