4.7 Article

Limb darkening and exoplanets - II. Choosing the best law for optimal retrieval of transit parameters

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw224

关键词

methods: data analysis; techniques: photometric; stars: atmospheres; stars: individual: exoplanets

资金

  1. CONICYT-PCHA/Doctorado Nacional
  2. FONDECYT [1130857]
  3. Ministry for the Economy, Development and Tourism Programa Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio [IC 120009]
  4. BASAL CATA [PFB-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Very precise measurements of exoplanet transit light curves both from ground-and space-based observatories make it now possible to fit the limb-darkening coefficients in the transit-fitting procedure rather than fix them to theoretical values. This strategy has been shown to give better results, as fixing the coefficients to theoretical values can give rise to important systematic errors which directly impact the physical properties of the system derived from such light curves such as the planetary radius. However, studies of the effect of limb-darkening assumptions on the retrieved parameters have mostly focused on the widely used quadratic limb-darkening law, leaving out other proposed laws that are either simpler or better descriptions of model intensity profiles. In this work, we show that laws such as the logarithmic, square-root and three-parameter law do a better job that the quadratic and linear laws when deriving parameters from transit light curves, both in terms of bias and precision, for a wide range of situations. We therefore recommend to study which law to use on a case-by-case basis. We provide code to guide the decision of when to use each of these laws and select the optimal one in a mean-square error sense, which we note has a dependence on both stellar and transit parameters. Finally, we demonstrate that the so-called exponential law is non-physical as it typically produces negative intensities close to the limb and should therefore not be used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据