4.6 Article

Evaluation of the influence of the formalin fixation time on the elemental content of tissues measured with X-ray fluorescence

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2023.106704

关键词

Formalin fixation; Human tissues; EDXRF; Quantification

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the influence of formalin fixation time on the elemental composition of human tissue samples using EDXRF. The results showed a clear decrease of Cl and K in the tissues during formalin fixation, and an uptake of P, likely due to the buffered formalin solution. These findings suggest that there may be different thresholds for the use of these elements as diagnostic tools in unfixed and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissues.
One of the most widely used methods for tissue preservation and fixative during transportation is the conservation in formalin during variable amounts of time. In this study, we have evaluated the influence of formalin fixation time in the elemental composition of human tissue samples using Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF).Ten sets of human tissue samples (from colon, ileum, stomach, and spleen) were exposed to different formalin fixation times, between 2 and 24 days, and for each tissue, the elemental content throughout time was compared to the elemental content of the snap-frozen sample of the same tissue that was not exposed to formalin. Additionally, in order to further evaluate the transference of elements, the formalin solution was also analysed using EDXRF.Our results showed a clear decrease of Cl and K in the tissues, transferred to the formalin solution. Conversely, there is an uptake of P in the tissue, likely due to the buffered formalin solution. The consistent alterations seen in the studied elements across all the ten different tissues allow us to hypothesize that in the future, there will be different thresholds for their use as diagnostic tools in unfixed (intraoperative exams) as well as formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据