4.7 Article

Prediction of acrylamide content in potato chips using near-infrared spectroscopy

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2023.122982

关键词

NIR spectroscopy; Potato chips; Acrylamide; Prediction; Effective wavenumbers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy to predict the content of acrylamide (ACR) in fried and baked potato chips. Effective wavenumbers were identified using competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) and the successive projections algorithm (SPA). Partial least squares (PLS) models were established based on full spectral wavebands and effective wavenumbers, and the results demonstrated the suitability of NIR spectroscopy for predicting ACR content in potato chips.
Acrylamide (ACR), a neurotoxin with carcinogenic properties that can affect fertility, is commonly found in fried and baked foods such as potato chips. This study was carried out to predict the ACR content in fried and baked potato chips using near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Effective wavenumbers were identified using competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) and the successive projections algorithm (SPA). Six wavenumbers (12799 cm- 1, 12007 cm- 1, 10944 cm- 1, 10943 cm- 1, 5801 cm- 1, and 4332 cm- 1) were selected using the ratio (Ai/Aj) and difference (Ai -Aj) of any two wavenumbers from the CARS and SPA results. First, partial least squares (PLS) models were established based on full spectral wavebands (12799-4000 cm- 1), and the prediction models were subsequently redeveloped based on effective wavenumbers to predict ACR content. Results showed that the full and selected wavenumbers-based PLS models obtained the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.7707 and 0.6670, respectively, and the root mean square errors of prediction (RMSEP) of 53.0442 & mu;g/kg and 64.3810 & mu;g/ kg, respectively, in the prediction sets. The results of this work demonstrate the suitability of NIR spectroscopy as a non-destructive method for predicting ACR content in potato chips.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据