4.7 Article

Modelling the Central Constant Emission X-ray component of η Carinae

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw339

关键词

hydrodynamics; radiative transfer; stars: individual: eta Carinae; stars: winds, outflows; X-rays: individual: eta Carinae

资金

  1. Chandra grant [GO4-15019A]
  2. XMM-Newton grant [NNX15AK62G]
  3. ADAP grant [NNX15AM96G]
  4. NASA Astrophysics Theory Program [NNX11AC40G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The X-ray emission of eta arinae shows multiple features at various spatial and temporal scales. The central constant emission (CCE) component is centred on the binary and arises from spatial scales much smaller than the bipolar Homunculus nebula, but likely larger than the central wind-wind collision region between the stars as it does not vary over the similar to 2-3 month X-ray minimum when it can be observed. Using large-scale 3D smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations, we model both the colliding-wind region between the stars, and the region where the secondary wind collides with primary wind ejected from the previous periastron passage. The simulations extend out to one hundred semimajor axes and make two limiting assumptions (strong coupling and no coupling) about the influence of the primary radiation field on the secondary wind. We perform 3D radiative transfer calculations on the SPH output to synthesize the X-ray emission, with the aim of reproducing the CCE spectrum. For the preferred primary mass-loss rate. M-A approximate to 8.5 x 10(-4)M circle dot yr(-1), the model spectra well reproduce the observation as the strong- and no-coupling spectra bound the CCE observation for longitude of periastron omega 252 degrees., and bound/converge on the observation for omega approximate to 90 degrees. This suggests that eta Carinae has moderate coupling between the primary radiation and secondary wind, that both the region between the stars and the comoving collision on the backside of the secondary generate the CCE, and that the CCE cannot place constraints on the binary's line of sight. We also discuss comparisons with common X-ray fitting parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据