4.8 Article

Promoting OH- Adsorption and Diffusion Enables Ultrahigh Capacity and Rate Capability of Nickel Sulfide Cathode for Aqueous Alkaline Zn-Based Batteries

期刊

SMALL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202306258

关键词

alkaline zinc batteries; heterostructures; hydroxyl adsorption and diffusion; nickel sulfide cathodes; ultrahigh capacity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterostructured Ni3S2/Ni(OH)2 nanosheets with excellent electrochemical performance were synthesized using a facile chemical etching strategy. Compared to Ni3S2, the heterostructured nanosheet cathode showed improved OH- adsorption and diffusion ability, resulting in increased capacity and rate capability. The assembled battery demonstrated high capacity, excellent rate performance, and cycling stability, with a prominent energy density.
Aqueous alkaline Zn-based batteries (AAZBs) possess great promise for large-scale applications thanks to their higher discharging plateau and unique reaction mechanism. However, the capacity and rate capability of Ni-based cathodes are still unsatisfactory due to their insufficient OH- adsorption and diffusion ability. Herein, heterostructured Ni3S2/Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets with outstanding electrochemical performance are synthesized via a facile chemical etching strategy. The heterostructured Ni3S2/Ni(OH)(2) nanosheet cathode shows significantly increased capacity and rate capability due to its boosted OH- adsorption and diffusion ability compared to Ni3S2. Consequently, the assembled Zn//Ni3S2/Ni(OH)(2) cell can deliver an ultrahigh capacity of 2.26 mAh cm(-2), an excellent rate performance (0.91 mAh cm(-2) at 100 mA cm(-2)) and a satisfying cycling stability (1.01 mAh cm(-2) at 20 mA cm(-2) after 500 cycles). Moreover, a prominent energy density of 3.86 mWh cm(-2) is obtained, which exceeds the majority of recently reported AAZBs. This work is expected to provide a new modification direction for developing high-performance nickel sulfide cathode for AAZBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据