4.8 Article

A Droplet Method for Synthesis of Multiclass Ultrathin Metal Halides

期刊

SMALL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202301573

关键词

2D materials; droplet methods; heterostructures; liquid-phase growth; metal halides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, there has been growing research interest in 2D metal halides; however, liquid-phase synthesis methods remain challenging. This study demonstrates a simple and efficient droplet method for synthesizing various types of multiclass 2D metal halides. The nucleation and growth of these metal halide nanosheets are determined by the supersaturation of precursor solutions, allowing for the fabrication of heterostructures and devices. The interfacing of SbI3/WSe2, for example, enhances the photoluminescence intensity and photo responsivity of WSe2. This work opens up new avenues for investigating and applying 2D metal halides.
2D metal halides have attracted increasing research attention in recent years; however, it is still challenging to synthesize them via liquid-phase methods. Here it is demonstrated that a droplet method is simple and efficient for the synthesis of multiclass 2D metal halides, including trivalent (BiI3, SbI3), divalent (SnI2, GeI2), and monovalent (CuI) ones. In particular, 2D SbI3 is first experimentally achieved, of which the thinnest thickness is & AP;6 nm. The nucleation and growth of these metal halide nanosheets are mainly determined by the supersaturation of precursor solutions that are dynamically varying during the solution evaporation. After solution drying, the nanosheets can fall on the surface of many different substrates, which further enables the feasible fabrication of related heterostructures and devices. With SbI3/WSe2 being a good demonstration, the photoluminescence intensity and photo responsivity of WSe2 is obviously enhanced after interfacing with SbI3. The work opens a new pathway for 2D metal halides toward widespread investigation and applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据