4.7 Article

Modelling the thermal X-ray emission around the Galactic Centre from colliding Wolf-Rayet winds

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2584

关键词

Galaxy: centre; stars: Wolf-Rayet; stars: winds; outflows; hydrodynamics; radiative transfer; X-rays: stars

资金

  1. NASA via the SAO/CXC grant [TM3-14006X]
  2. CONICYT-Chile through FONDECYT grant [1141175]
  3. CONICYT-Chile through Basal grant [PFB0609]
  4. CONICYT-Chile through Anillo grant [ACT1101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Galactic Centre is a hotbed of astrophysical activity, with the injection of wind material from similar to 30 massive Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars orbiting within 12 arcsec of the supermassive black hole (SMBH) playing an important role. Hydrodynamic simulations of such colliding and accreting winds produce a complex density and temperature structure of cold wind material shocking with the ambient medium, creating a large reservoir of hot, X-ray-emitting gas. This work aims to confront the 3 Ms of Chandra X-ray Visionary Program observations of this diffuse emission by computing the X-ray emission from these hydrodynamic simulations of the colliding WR winds, amid exploring a variety of SMBH feedback mechanisms. The major success of the model is that it reproduces the spectral shape from the 2-5 arcsec ring around the SMBH, where most of the stellar wind material that is ultimately captured by Sgr A* is shock-heated and thermalized. This naturally explains that the hot gas comes from colliding WR winds, and that the wind speeds of these stars are, in general, well constrained. The flux level of these spectra, as well as 12 x 12-arcsec(2) images of 4-9 keV, shows that the X-ray flux is tied to the SMBH feedback strength; stronger feedback clears out more hot gas, thereby decreasing the thermal X-ray emission. The model in which Sgr A* produced an intermediate-strength outflow during the last few centuries best matches the observations to within about 10 per cent, showing that SMBH feedback is required to interpret the X-ray emission in this region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据