4.5 Article

VISCOELASTODYNAMICS OF SWELLING POROUS SOLIDS AT LARGE STRAINS BY AN EULERIAN APPROACH*

期刊

SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 2677-2703

出版社

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/22M1474229

关键词

poroelasticity; elastodynamics; finite strains; squeezing; swelling; multipolar con-tinua; transport equations; Galerkin approximation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a model of saturated hyperelastic porous solids at large strains is formulated and analyzed. The material response is assumed to be of a viscoelastic Kelvin-Voigt type, and inertial effects are considered as well. The flow of the diffusant is driven by the gradient of the chemical potential and is coupled to the mechanics via the occurrence of swelling and squeezing. Buoyancy effects due to the evolving mass density in a gravity field are covered, and higher-order viscosity is included for physically relevant stored energies and local invertibility of the deformation. The whole system is formulated in a fully Eulerian form in terms of rates. The energetics of the model is discussed, and the existence and regularity of weak solutions is proved by a combined regularization-Galerkin approximation argument.
A model of saturated hyperelastic porous solids at large strains is formulated and analyzed. The material response is assumed to be of a viscoelastic Kelvin--Voigt type, and inertial effects are considered, too. The flow of the diffusant is driven by the gradient of the chemical potential and is coupled to the mechanics via the occurrence of swelling and squeezing. Buoyancy effects due to the evolving mass density in a gravity field are covered. Higher-order viscosity is also included, allowing for physically relevant stored energies and local invertibility of the deformation. The whole system is formulated in a fully Eulerian form in terms of rates. The energetics of the model is discussed, and the existence and regularity of weak solutions is proved by a combined regularization-Galerkin approximation argument.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据