4.7 Article

Molecular mechanism of casein-chitosan fouling during microfiltration

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124659

关键词

Casein-chitosan complexes; Molecular docking; Fouling mechanism; Electrostatic binding energy; Filtration property

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the filtration property of casein-chitosan complexes under different conditions was analyzed, and the fouling mechanism was explained. Results showed that a higher pH and more polysaccharide content can slow down fouling growth rate, but a higher pH is unfavorable for long-term processing. The effect of pH on the process was found to be more significant than other factors.
In this study, the casein-chitosan complexes were subjected to microfiltration. The filtration property was analyzed, and the molecular mechanism of fouling was explained under different medium pH, casein-chitosan ratios and ionic strength. Results suggest that a higher pH and more polysaccharide can slow down the fouling growth rate, but a higher pH is unfavorable for long-term processing. Especially the effect of pH on the process was far more significant than the others. At pH 2.8, most of amino acid residues combined with chitosan to form the denser particles and to generate the gel consistency and yield stress. Thus, the severe fouling resistance was caused by the tight gel layer stacked on membrane surface. At pH 6.8-7.8, the electrostatic binding energy between casein and chitosan decreased. The complexes gel consistency and yield stress disappeared, and the incompact network was formed. Thereby, the cake layer density and the fouling growth rate were reduced. At pH 4.8, the amino acid residues of & alpha;S1- and & beta;-casein bound to chitosan decreased. Although the complex exhibited the gel consistency and yield stress, the microfiltration efficiency was improved due to the decrease of binding sites. This work provides new evidences into understanding the membrane fouling mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据