4.7 Article

Exploitation of pomelo peel developing porous biochar by N, P co-doping and KOH activation for efficient CO2 adsorption

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124595

关键词

Biochar; Pomelo peel; P co -doping; KOH activation; CO 2 adsorption

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel biochar adsorbents were synthesized using pomelo peel by two-step carbonization and activation, with (NH4)2HPO4 and KOH as the dopant and activator. The N, P co-doped pomelo peel-based biochar (NPBCs) showed the development of meso-, micro-, ultra-micropores, and nanocapsules structure, with a certain N, P content. The optimum sample of NPBCs exhibited high CO2 adsorption capacities and good cyclic stability.
In order to improve the exploitation of biochar-based adsorbents for CO2 capture, novel biochar adsorbents were synthesized with pomelo peel by effective two-step carbonization and activation, (NH4)2HPO4 and KOH were taken as the dopant and activator, then a series of N, P co-doped pomelo peel-based biochar (NPBCs) was prepared, subsequently, the characteristics and adsorption capacity of NPBCs were studied. The results showed that N, P co-doping and KOH activation synergistically promoted the development of meso-, micro-, ultra-micropores and nanocapsules structure in NPBCs, and enabled NPBCs maintaining a certain N, P content. The optimum sample of NPBCs reached the highest CO2 adsorption capacities of 3.41 and 5.74 mmol/g at 298.15 K, 273.15 K and 1 bar. The adsorption kinetics and isotherms of CO2 on biochar were perfectly described by PFO model and Sips model respectively, indicating that the adsorption was a rapid process and dominated by physical effect. Measurements of the thermal range of CO2 adsorption (15.59-26.01 kJ/mol) confirmed strong affinity of the NPBCs to CO2 molecules. CO2/N2 selectivity up to 165 was recorded at ambient temperature and low CO2 partial pressure. The loss of adsorption capacity of NPBCs was only 9.36% after 10 cycles showing good cyclic stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据