4.7 Article

Gravitational wave background from Population III binary black holes consistent with cosmic reionization

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1431

关键词

black hole physics; gravitational waves; stars: Population III

资金

  1. Simons Foundation through the Simons Society of Fellows
  2. NASA through an Einstein Postdoctoral Fellowship
  3. Columbia Prize Postdoctoral Fellowship in the Natural Sciences
  4. NASA [NNX11AE05G, NNX15AB19G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent discovery of the gravitational wave source GW150914 has revealed a coalescing binary black hole (BBH) with masses of similar to 30 M-circle dot. Previous proposals for the origin of such a massive binary include Population III (PopIII) stars. PopIII stars are efficient producers of BBHs and of a gravitational wave background (GWB) in the 10-100 Hz band, and also of ionizing radiation in the early Universe. We quantify the relation between the amplitude of the GWB (Omega(gw)) and the electron scattering optical depth (tau(e)), produced by PopIII stars, assuming that f(esc) approximate to 10 per cent of their ionizing radiation escapes into the intergalactic medium. We find that PopIII stars would produce a GWB that is detectable by the future O5 LIGO/Virgo if tau(e) greater than or similar to 0.07, consistent with the recent Planck measurement of tau(e) = 0.055 +/- 0.09. Moreover, the spectral index of the background from PopIII BBHs becomes as small as d ln Omega(gw)/d ln f less than or similar to 0.3 at f greater than or similar to 30 Hz, which is significantly flatter than the value similar to 2/3 generically produced by lower redshift and less-massive BBHs. A detection of the unique flattening at such low frequencies by the O5 LIGO/Virgo will indicate the existence of a high-chirp mass, high-redshift BBH population, which is consistent with the PopIII origin. A precise characterization of the spectral shape near 30-50 Hz by the Einstein Telescope could also constrain the PopIII initial mass function and star formation rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据