4.7 Article

Intracellular biothiols assisted triple-channel imaging of mitochondrial HClO in living cells

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.134304

关键词

Biothiols assisted; Triple-channel image; Hypochlorous acid; Fluorescent probes; Mitochondria-targetable

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A robust mitochondria-targetable fluorescent probe, MBP, was constructed for selective sensing of HClO with unrivalled triple-channel fluorescence turn-on manner. The probe exhibited good selectivity, fast response, and excellent mitochondrial-targeting potency. It also showed potential for biological investigations through triple channel fluorescence image of exogenous/endogenous HClO in living cells.
A robust mitochondria-targetable fluorescent probe, MBP, for HClO was judiciously constructed by directly connecting a leucomethylene moiety and a pyronin dye through an o-phenylenediamino linker. Under the assistance of intracellular Cys and GSH, MBP can selectively sense HClO through an unrivalled triple-channel fluorescence (peaked at 541, 620, and 690 nm, respectively) turn-on manner for the first time, and the related LOD based on distinct channels data were calculated to be 17, 9, and 31 nM, respectively. This distinctive fluorescence signal response pattern can provide mutual signals for corroboration, which may have the potential to significantly diminish the interferences aroused from external factors, thereby guaranteeing more reliable experimental data outputting. Moreover, MBP also displayed some other powerful properties, including good selectivity, fast response (within 180 s) toward HClO, and excellent mitochondrial-targeting potency (the corresponding Pearson's coefficient was determined to be 0.96). Noteworthily, the application of MBP for triple channel fluorescence image of exogenous/endogenous HClO in living cells has been successfully achieved, thereby holding the potential for biological investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据