4.7 Article

All-in-one microfluidic chip for 30-min quantitative point-of-care-testing of nucleic acids

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 390, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133939

关键词

Nucleic acid; Microfluidic chip; Extraction; Quantitative testing; Point-of-care testing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a microfluidic chip is proposed for on-site and rapid nucleic acid detection. The system has the advantages of high integration, low cost, and potential for large-scale production. It can be used for wide range screening during the COVID-19 pandemic and shows promising clinical application prospects.
Nucleic acid testing (NAT) is directly oriented to determining the genetic material of pathogens and is characterized by its high sensitivity and specificity, which are indispensable qualities in disease diagnosis. However, standard laboratory NAT methods require joint testing by highly trained inspectors using multiple instruments in professional laboratories. The entire process requires many manual steps, and the total testing time may range from 3 to 5 h, indicating that these methods cannot be used to realize the demands of on-site rapid testing. In this study, we propose a microfluidic chip for the on-site and rapid detection of nucleic acids. We utilize dynamic sealing, ultrasound, and advanced control methods and integrate the entire process of reagent pre-storage, extraction, Real-time Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and fluorescence detection. The sensitivity of this system is in line with current clinical standards, and the nucleic acid quantification process is completed fully automated within 30 min. Compared with conventional microfluidic chips, the proposed system has the advantages of high integration, low cost, and it may be produced at a high volume. Moreover, it can be used in a wide range of screening cases in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and exhibits broad clinical application prospects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据