4.7 Article

Flexible three-axis tactile sensor based on double-layer electrospun polyimide nanofiber membrane

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
卷 357, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2023.114369

关键词

Capacitive tactile sensor; Double-layer electrospun nanofiber membrane; Polyimide; Three-axis force sensing; Human-machine interaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The construction of multi-modal human-machine interaction system enables computers to be more adaptable to humans. A flexible three-axis tactile sensor with a double electrospun polyimide (PI) nanofiber membrane as a dielectric layer has been proposed to sense multi-axis forces. Different thicknesses of the double PI nanofiber membranes were explored to optimize the dielectric layer. The sensor exhibited high sensitivity, wide scale range, quick response, and good cyclic stability, making it suitable for various applications in artificial skin and robotics.
The construction of multi-modal human-machine interaction system makes computer more and more adaptable to human. A flexible three-axis tactile sensor based on a double electrospun polyimide (PI) nanofiber membrane as a dielectric layer has been proposed to sense the multi-axis forces like normal and shearing. A range of thicknesses of double PI nanofiber membranes were explored to optimize the dielectric layer. The sensor with such a dielectric layer exhibited high sensitivity (average sensitivities of the force sensor units were 1.5370 N-1, 0.6620 N-1 and 0.6960 N-1, respectively for the normal force, X-axis, and Y-axis shear forces), wide scale range (0-8 N, 0-3 N, 0-3 N, respectively), quick response (87.5 ms) and good cyclic stability (>10,000 cycles). A typical 4 x 4 sensor array could be used to accurately sense and then designed to achieve multiple combination control modes. A three-axis tactile force sensor may advance artificial skin and robotic applications such as human-machine interaction and disability rehabilitation in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据