4.6 Article

Finding Well-Coupled Optical Fiber Locations for Railway Monitoring Using Distributed Acoustic Sensing

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23146599

关键词

distributed acoustic sensing; railway monitoring; train tracking; optical fiber coupling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distributed acoustic sensors (DAS) use optical fibers to monitor vibrations at multiple locations. A correlation-based method is proposed to automatically find spatial monitoring locations with good temporal waveform repeatability, taking into account changes in coupling and acoustic interference. The results show high repeatability for measurements taken over three days, even with variations in fiber installation along the railway track.
Distributed acoustic sensors (DAS) utilize optical fibers to monitor vibrations across thousands of independent locations. However, the measured acoustic waveforms experience significant variations along the sensing fiber. These differences primarily arise from changes in coupling between the fiber and its surrounding medium as well as acoustic interferences. Here, a correlation-based method is proposed to automatically find the spatial locations of DAS where temporal waveforms are repeatable. Signal repeatability is directly associated with spatial monitoring locations with both good coupling and low acoustic interference. The DAS interrogator employed is connected to an over 30-year-old optical fiber installed alongside a railway track. Thus, the optical fiber exhibits large coupling changes and different installation types along its path. The results indicate that spatial monitoring locations with good temporal waveform repeatability can be automatically discriminated using the proposed method. The correlation between the temporal waveforms acquired at locations selected by the algorithm proved to be very high considering measurements taken for three days, the first two on consecutive days and the third one a month after the first measurement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据