4.6 Article

Non-Uniform Clustering Algorithm for UWSNs Based on Energy Equalization

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23125466

关键词

energy equalization; non-uniform cluster; underwater sensor networks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Underwater sensor nodes are randomly deployed in the underwater environment, resulting in uneven distribution and energy consumption. To address this issue, a non-uniform clustering algorithm is proposed, considering node energy, density, and coverage redundancy. The algorithm selects cluster heads and designs cluster sizes to equalize energy consumption. Simulation results show that the algorithm prolongs network lifetime, balances energy consumption, and maintains network coverage better than other algorithms.
Underwater sensor nodes are usually deployed by ships, aircraft, etc., in random drops, and there is current movement in the underwater environment, which results in an uneven distribution of sensor nodes and thus, different energy consumption in each area of the network. In addition, the underwater sensor network also has a hot zone problem. To address the uneven energy consumption of the network caused by the above problem, the non-uniform clustering algorithm for energy equalization is put forward. Considering the residual energy, density and coverage redundancy of nodes, this algorithm selects the cluster heads and makes them more reasonably distributed. Additionally, according to the selected cluster heads, the size of each cluster is designed to equalize the energy consumption of the network during multi-hop routing. In this process, the residual energy of cluster heads and the mobility of nodes are considered, and real-time maintenance is performed for each cluster. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is effective in prolonging the network lifetime and balancing the network energy consumption; moreover, the network coverage maintenance is better than that of other algorithms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据