4.6 Article

A Novel Adaptive Robust Cubature Kalman Filter for Maneuvering Target Tracking with Model Uncertainty and Abnormal Measurement Noises

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23156966

关键词

target tracking; H-infinity cubature Kalman filter; adaptive fading factor; Sage-Husa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The features of measurement and process noise are directly related to the optimal performance of the cubature Kalman filter. The maneuvering target model's high level of uncertainty and non-Gaussian mean noise are typical issues that the radar tracking system must deal with, making it impossible to obtain the appropriate estimation. How to strike a compromise between high robustness and estimation accuracy while designing filters has always been challenging.
The features of measurement and process noise are directly related to the optimal performance of the cubature Kalman filter. The maneuvering target model's high level of uncertainty and non-Gaussian mean noise are typical issues that the radar tracking system must deal with, making it impossible to obtain the appropriate estimation. How to strike a compromise between high robustness and estimation accuracy while designing filters has always been challenging. The H-infinity filter is a widely used robust algorithm. Based on the H-infinity cubature Kalman filter (HCKF), a novel adaptive robust cubature Kalman filter (ARCKF) is suggested in this paper. There are two adaptable components in the algorithm. First, an adaptive fading factor addresses the model uncertainty issue brought on by the target's maneuvering turn. Second, an improved Sage-Husa estimation based on the Mahalanobis distance (MD) is suggested to estimate the measurement noise covariance matrix adaptively. The new approach significantly increases the robustness and estimation precision of the HCKF. According to the simulation results, the suggested algorithm is more effective than the conventional HCKF at handling system model errors and abnormal observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据