4.7 Article

Strong bimodality in the host halo mass of central galaxies from galaxy-galaxy lensing

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw188

关键词

gravitational lensing: weak; galaxies: haloes; galaxies: stellar content; cosmology: observations

资金

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. Durham Junior Research Fellowship [RF040353]
  3. European Research Council [246797]
  4. Zwicky fellowship
  5. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan
  6. CSTP, Japan
  7. JSPS Promotion of Science [15K17600]
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H01089, 15K17600] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We use galaxy galaxy lensing to study the dark matter haloes surrounding a sample of locally brightest galaxies (LBGs) selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We measure mean halo mass as a function of the stellar mass and colour of the central galaxy. Mock catalogues constructed from semi-analytic galaxy formation simulations demonstrate that most LBGs are the central objects of their haloes, greatly reducing interpretation uncertainties due to satellite contributions to the lensing signal. Over the full stellar mass range, 10.3 < log[M-*/M-circle dot] < 11.6, we find that passive central galaxies have haloes that are at least twice as massive as those of star-forming objects of the same stellar mass. The significance of this effect exceeds 3 sigma for log[M-*/M-circle dot] > 10.7. Tests using the mock catalogues and on the data themselves clarify the effects of LBG selection and show that it cannot artificially induce a systematic dependence of halo mass on LBG colour. The bimodality in halo mass at fixed stellar mass is reproduced by the astrophysical model underlying our mock catalogue, but the sign of the effect is inconsistent with recent, nearly parameter-free age-matching models. The sign and magnitude of the effect can, however, be reproduced by halo occupation distribution models with a simple (few-parameter) prescription for type dependence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据