4.6 Article

Fabrication of Micro-Cantilever Sensor Based on Clay Minerals for Humidity Detection

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23156962

关键词

humidity sensor; micro-cantilever; montmorillonite; kaolinite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel humidity sensors based on montmorillonite, kaolinite, and composite films coated on micro-cantilevers were prepared to measure the relative humidity values. The humidity-sensing properties were investigated and a linear correlation between humidity change and deflection was observed for montmorillonite, kaolinite, and the mixed-clay mineral film. Montmorillonite showed better sensitivity compared to kaolinite, with the mixed-clay mineral film falling in between. This research provides a feasible and effective approach to constructing high-performance micro-cantilever humidity sensors based on clay minerals at room temperature.
In this paper, novel humidity sensors based on montmorillonite, kaolinite, and composite films coated on micro-cantilevers were prepared to measure the relative humidity (RH) values by the deflection of a micro-cantilever (MC) at room temperature. The humidity-sensing properties, such as response and recovery, sensitivity, repeatability, humidity hysteresis, and long-term stability, were investigated in the range of working humidity (10-80% RH). The humidity response in the close humidity range of 10% RH to 80% RH revealed a linear increase in water absorption of montmorillonite, kaolinite, and montmorillonite/kaolinite mixed dispersant (1:1) as a function of RH with linear correlation factors between the humidity change and deflection estimated to be 0.994, 0.991, and 0.946, respectively. Montmorillonite's sensitivity was better than kaolinite's, with the mixed-clay mineral film's response falling somewhere in between. This research provides a feasible and effective approach to constructing high-performance MC humidity sensors that can be operated at room temperature based on clay minerals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据