4.4 Article

What Role Does Microthrombosis Play in Long COVID?

期刊

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774795

关键词

long COVID-19; microclots; SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; coagulation; platelets

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long COVID (postacute sequelae of COVID-19 [PASC]) refers to the sustained symptoms of fatigue, cognitive disturbance, and muscle ache/weakness in patients who have recovered from acute COVID-19 infection, with a prevalence estimated to be 10 to 20% of convalescent patients. Microclots in circulation may be one of the causes. Despite studies on the pathophysiology of PASC, the exact mechanism remains unclear.
Soon after the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), unexplained sustained fatigue, cognitive disturbance, and muscle ache/weakness were reported in patients who had recovered from acute COVID-19 infection. This abnormal condition has been recognized as long COVID (postacute sequelae of COVID-19 [PASC]) with a prevalence estimated to be from 10 to 20% of convalescent patients. Although the pathophysiology of PASC has been studied, the exact mechanism remains obscure. Microclots in circulation can represent one of the possible causes of PASC. Although hypercoagulability and thrombosis are critical mechanisms of acute COVID-19, recent studies have reported that thromboinflammation continues in some patients, even after the virus has cleared. Viral spike proteins and RNA can be detected months after patients have recovered, findings that may be responsible for persistent thromboinflammation and the development of microclots. Despite this theory, long-term results of anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, and vascular endothelial protection are inconsistent, and could not always show beneficial treatment effects. In summary, PASC reflects a heterogeneous condition, and microclots cannot explain all the presenting symptoms. After clarification of the pathomechanisms of each symptom, a symptom- or biomarker-based stratified approach should be considered for future studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据