4.7 Article

The relevance of ambipolar diffusion for neutron star evolution

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2936

关键词

methods: numerical; stars: evolution; stars: magnetars; stars: magnetic field; stars:neutron

资金

  1. European Union [656370]
  2. Spanish MINECO [AYA2013-42184-P, AYA2015-66899-C2-2-P]
  3. New Compstar COST action [MP1304]
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [656370] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study ambipolar diffusion in strongly magnetized neutron stars, with special focus on the effects of neutrino reaction rates and the impact of a superfluid/superconducting transition in the neutron star core. For axisymmetric magnetic field configurations, we determine the deviation from beta-equilibrium induced by the magnetic force and calculate the velocity of the slow, quasi-stationary, ambipolar drift. We study the temperature dependence of the velocity pattern and clearly identify the transition to a predominantly solenoidal flow. For stars without superconducting/superfluid constituents and with a mixed poloidal-toroidal magnetic field of typical magnetar strength, we find that ambipolar diffusion proceeds fast enough to have a significant impact on the magnetic field evolution only at low core temperatures, T less than or similar to 1- 2 x 10(8) K. The ambipolar diffusion time-scale becomes appreciably shorter when fast neutrino reactions are present, because the possibility to balance part of the magnetic force with pressure gradients is reduced. We also find short ambipolar diffusion time-scales in the case of superconducting cores for T less than or similar to 10(9) K, due to the reduced interaction between protons and neutrons. In the most favourable scenario, with fast neutrino reactions and superconducting cores, ambipolar diffusion results in advection velocities of several km kyr(- 1). This velocity can substantially reorganize magnetic fields in magnetar cores, in a way which can only be confirmed by dynamical simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据