4.7 Article

Standardizing Type Ia supernovae optical brightness using near-infrared rebrightening time

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2278

关键词

methods: data analysis; methods: statistical; supernovae: general; distance scale

资金

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council (UK) [ST/N000838/1]
  2. EPSRC 'Pathways to Impact' grant
  3. Wolfson Research Merit Award by the British Royal Society [WM110023]
  4. Marie-Curie Career Integration grant by European Commission [FP7-PEOPLE-2012-CIG-321865]
  5. European Commission [H2020-MSCA-RISE-2015-691164]
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/N000838/1, ST/K001051/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. STFC [ST/N000838/1, ST/K001051/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate standardization of Type Ia supernovae (SNIa) is instrumental to the usage of SNIa as distance indicators. We analyse a homogeneous sample of 22 low-z SNIa, observed by the Carnegie Supernova Project in the optical and near-infrared (NIR). We study the time of the second peak in the J band, t(2), as an alternative standardization parameter of SNIa peak optical brightness, as measured by the standard SALT2 parameter m(B). We use BAHAMAS, a Bayesian hierarchical model for SNIa cosmology, to estimate the residual scatter in the Hubble diagram. We find that in the absence of a colour correction, t(2) is a better standardization parameter compared to stretch: t(2) has a 1 sigma posterior interval for the Hubble residual scatter of sigma(Delta mu) = {0.250, 0.257} mag, compared to sigma(Delta mu) = {0.280, 0.287} mag when stretch (x(1)) alone is used. We demonstrate that when employed together with a colour correction, t(2) and stretch lead to similar residual scatter. Using colour, stretch and t(2) jointly as standardization parameters does not result in any further reduction in scatter, suggesting that t(2) carries redundant information with respect to stretch and colour. With a much larger SNIa NIR sample at higher redshift in the future, t(2) could be a useful quantity to perform robustness checks of the standardization procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据