4.7 Review

How does Life Cycle Assessment capture the environmental impacts of A review

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 890, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164094

关键词

Food system; Environmental outcome; Systematic review; Silvopasture; Agrosilviculture; Agrosilvopasture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the application of environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in agroforestry in the context of food systems is systematically reviewed. The findings reveal that most of the studies are conducted in tropical climates with limited consideration of post-farm gate system boundaries. Methodological issues include limited system boundaries, few impact categories, and differing functional units and multifunctionality approaches. The effects of agroforestry systems on biodiversity, climate change mitigation, water, soil, pollination, and pest and disease are only partially documented or not analyzed in the LCA studies.
In this paper, a systematic review approach was used to evaluate how environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been applied in agroforestry in the context of food systems. This review was used as the basis for discussing method-ological issues in the LCA framework for agroforestry systems (AFS) and relevant environmental outcomes in the ag-roforestry literature. A total of 32 LCAs in 17 countries identified in four databases and spanning a decade form the basis for this paper. Studies were selected based on pre-defined inclusion criteria and followed established guidelines and a review protocol. Qualitative data were extracted and categorized into multiple themes. Results were quantita-tively synthesized for the four phases of the LCA for each individual agroforestry practice (i.e., based on its structural composition). Results showed that around half of the selected studies are located in tropical climates, the rest being in temperate climates, predominantly in Southern Europe. Studies primarily used a mass functional unit and rarely in-cluded post-farm gate system boundaries. Almost half of the studies account for multifunctionality, and most allocation methods were based on physical properties. Climate change had the greatest coverage from all impact categories with some variations within milk, meat, and crop production systems. Methodological issues were related to limited system boundaries, few impact categories, and differing functional units and multifunctionality approaches. The identified ef-fects of AFS on biodiversity, climate change mitigation, water, soil, pollination, and pest and disease were only par-tially documented or not analyzed in the LCA studies or the LCA framework. Gaps in knowledge and limitations of the present review were discussed. Further methodological improvements remain necessary to determine the net en-vironmental effects of food products resulting from individual AFS, especially within the area of multifunctionality, carbon sequestration, and biodiversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据