4.7 Article

Probing the active galactic nucleus unified model torus properties in Seyfert galaxies

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2477

关键词

molecular processes; galaxies: active; galaxies: nuclei; galaxies: Seyfert; infrared: galaxies

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. FAPERGS/CAPES
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  4. NASA.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the physical parameters of a sample comprising of all Spitzer/Infrared Spectrograph public spectra of Seyfert galaxies in the mid-infrared (5.2-38 mu m range) under the active galactic nucleus (AGN) unified model. We compare the observed spectra with similar to 10(6) CLUMPY model spectral energy distributions, which consider a torus composed of dusty clouds. We find a slight difference in the distribution of line-of-sight inclination angle, i, requiring larger angles for Seyfert 2 (Sy 2) and a broader distribution for Seyfert 1 (Sy 1). We found small differences in the torus angular width, sigma, indicating that Sy 1 may host a slightly narrower torus than Sy 2. The torus thickness, together with the bolometric luminosities derived, suggests a very compact torus up to similar to 6 pc from the central AGN. The number of clouds along the equatorial plane, N, as well the index of the radial profile, q, is nearly the same for both types. These results imply that the torus cloud distribution is nearly the same for type 1 and type 2 objects. The torus mass is almost the same for both types of activity, with values in the range of M-tor similar to 10(4) - 10(7) M-circle dot. The main difference appears to be related to the clouds' intrinsic properties: type 2 sources present higher optical depths tau(V). The results presented here reinforce the suggestion that the classification of a galaxy may also depend on the intrinsic properties of the torus clouds rather than simply on their inclination. This is in contradiction with the simple geometric idea of the unification model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据