4.7 Article

The behavior of microplastics and nanoplastics release from UV-aged masks in the water

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 891, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164361

关键词

Microplastics; Nanoplastics; UV; Face mask; Aging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UV irradiation was found to exacerbate the damage to disposable masks over time and increase the release of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) from the masks. The middle layer of the mask was damaged first, followed by all layers as the irradiation time increased. There was no significant difference in the quantity of M/NPs released at different irradiance levels, but the release of M/NPs increased exponentially with increasing UV irradiation time.
In this study, three types of disposable masks were exposed to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation to determine the effect of UV irradiation on the release of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastic (NPs) from the masks. A kinetic model was used to investigate the mechanisms of M/NP release from the masks under UV irradiation. Results showed that UV irradiation exacerbated the damage to the structure of the mask over time. As the irradiation time increased, the middle layer of the mask was damaged first (15 d) and subsequently all layers of the mask were damaged (30 d). There was no signif-icant difference in the quantity of M/NPs released from the treatment groups at different irradiance during a 5-d irra-diation period. When the UV time reached 15 and 30 d, the highest quantity of M/NPs was released at 8.5 W/m2 followed by 4.9 W/m2, 15.4 W/m2, and 17.1 W/m2. Exponential equations fitted the release curve of M/NPs. The re-lease quantity of M/NPs increases exponentially with increasing UV irradiation time, and the longer the irradiation time, the faster the rate of increase. Estimated release of 1.78 x 1017-3.66 x 1019 particles/piece of MPs and 8.23 x 1019-2.18 x 1022 particles/piece of NPs into the water when the masks are exposed to the real environment for 1-3 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据